Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) inform the care of future patients and are especially important to clinicians and systematic reviewers. Readers should satisfy themselves that the study methods were sound. Clinicians should consider the relevance to their own patients, both benefits and harms, and absolute as well as relative effects. Trial reports should provide a clear, transparent, and complete report of what was done and what was found. Unfortunately, bad reporting of RCTs is common, which has serious consequences for clinical practice, research, policy making, and ultimately for patients. RCT reports should adhere to the CONSORT Statement, a minimum set of items that should be addressed. Authors, peer reviewers, and editors should all work to ensure that research reports maximize the value derived from the cost and effort of conducting a trial.

Original publication

DOI

10.1038/ajg.2012.457

Type

Journal article

Journal

Am J Gastroenterol

Publication Date

08/2013

Volume

108

Pages

1231 - 1235

Keywords

Checklist, Guideline Adherence, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Peer Review, Research, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Quality Control, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Design, Research Report